When an organization scales it's going to become hierarchical.
Does that necessarily apply to all organisations?
If so, what does it say about how nation states are (necessarily) managed?
It looks to me like an argument for dictatorship (or even for the feudalistic variety of dictatorship: Absolute Monarchy, with a hierarchical aristocracy. The CEO is king; His board of princes and dukes tell the counts, earls, viscounts, and barons what to do, and the peasants do the actual work).
It's always struck me as odd that the people who are most powerful "captains of industry", simultaneously say that countries should be democratic regimes run by consensus, with a free market economy that uses money to signal priorities for action; While operating companies that are totalitarian, top down hierarchies, with central planning that prioritises action based on the edicts of those at the top of the heap.
I have yet to hear a truly convincing argument that explains how these positions are not, in fact, contradictory. A country may not be much like a small business; But it's really not hugely different from a large and diverse corporation.