What is with the attitude?
I don't want to police any minds. I don't care what they think. That doesn't mean we shouldn't consider criminal intent when designing AI and put in stoppers to prevent disseminating information that isn't in people's best interest. Admittedly, this isn't an easy task. But preventing people from getting AI to design a bomb is hardly authoritarian.
The attitude is soaked in deep concern.
It is not in your prerogatives to force your concept of my best interest on a third party.
My best interest is to be as capable as possible.
It is absolutely authoritarian to prevent people from getting AI to tell them how to design a bomb, or even getting AI to do the design work, because it is not illegal to design a bomb.
I can download a bunch of easy, effective bomb designs and recipes, that I
could build today.
It is illegal to
build a bomb. Ok, some bombs. In some contexts. It is illegal to
have a bomb, again in some contexts. It is not illegal to
design a bomb. I mean shit, you say the words "design a bomb" in any context, especially following "don't" and you can damn sure bet a process, essentially a language model made of meat, spins up and starts working on designing a bomb.
The last time someone argued the point you did, using 'thermite' instead of 'bomb' my effective response was to just vomit back the recipe I already knew for an effective thermite recipe.
Needless to say, I have a bomb design in my head on how to make rather effective 3d-printed shaped charge, claymore style mine, and various ignition systems, but here I'm not going to post them because it's not really germane.
I got it off Google, mostly, myself, and mostly am just applying modern home manufacturing with pre-existing 12/21b subject matter expertise and those google results.
It is absolutely authoritarian to say "humans can do that but AI aren't allowed".