• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

“Revolution in Thought: A new look at determinism and free will"

Bleeding obvious is right.
You already erased his claim before you ever understood it. Who does that when they’re using a conclusion to prove that a first premise is false? It’s an effort that is used to justify the popular position in the hope that no one’s looking who sees the flaw. Sadly, it’s no closer to the truth. 🧐
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom