You already erased his claim before you ever understood it. Who does that when they’re using a conclusion to prove that a first premise is false? It’s an effort that is used to justify the popular position in the hope that no one’s looking who sees the flaw. Sadly, it’s no closer to the truth.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.